The idea that selected changes in Bilaterian's bodies would cause an increase in juvenile cancer rates has been part of my theory from its inception; it was clearly expressed in the 1984 Journal of Theoretical Biology Letter as it was in manuscripts submitted to other journals as early as 1979.
Here is a relevant paragraph from the 1984 Letter:
Adaptive pro-oncogenes are those that imparted some survival benefit to the germ line in spite of a likely increase in juvenile deaths from cancer following their selection. Increased somatic complexity, greater body size, extended pre-reproductive life and migration to more mutagenic habitats occurred in so many Bilaterian lineages that they can be confidently judged to have been adaptive. It is, however, most probable that selection of such characters was followed by increases in the incidence of somatic mutational events in juveniles and resulted in increased losses of genetic material to cancer.
Here is an overview of relevant pediatric cancers that seem to support this part of my theory.
Brain cancer. We know that the human brain reached its current form relatively recently, about two million years ago, compared to the origin of Bilaterians (and, according to my theory, cancer) about 550 million years ago.
Leukemia/Lymphoma. Our immune defenses must adapt—change—continuously to cope with evolutionary modifications in pathogens.
Bone cancers originating in arms and legs. Human limbs are longer than those of other primates, strongly suggesting that they are longer than those of our direct pre-human ancestors. These cancers occur in adolescents as well as in younger children.
Retinoblastoma. The human eye, perhaps our most finely wrought organ, probably underwent perfectionizing modifications throughout evolutionary time, including the relatively recent. This rare eye cancer occurs most frequently in young children.
At present, the most common sites-of-origin cancers in American children are leukemia/lymphoma and brain cancer.
I describe the critical evolutionary role played by cancers in modified tissue throughout Bilaterian evolution in Chapter Three of my book Cancer Selection. In my opinion, the present-day occurrence of pediatric cancers confirms the continue presence of the powerful selection pressure that compelled nothing less than utmost perfection in the expression of modifications in the development program. Some indirect acknowledgement of this evolutionary dynamic was expressed by Crespi and Summers when they wrote, with my book cited as their source, that following the selection of certain morphological changes " ... increased cancer rates evolve as a more or less transitory evolutionary byproduct."
Comments and questions are welcomed here.
At this site you will find links to additional material including my original Letters to the Journal of Theoretical Biology and the 1992 Nature review of my book.
Copyright © 2015 by James Graham
This page was archived at Way Back Machine on August 25, 2015.
Comments and questions are welcomed here.
At this site you will find links to additional material including my original Letters to the Journal of Theoretical Biology and the 1992 Nature review of my book.
Copyright © 2015 by James Graham
This page was archived at Way Back Machine on June 29, 2015.
- See more at: http://cancerselection.blogspot.com/2015/06/updated-visitors-to-this-site-and-their.html#sthash.OU3IBbTU.dpuf
At this site you will find links to additional material including my original Letters to the Journal of Theoretical Biology and the 1992 Nature review of my book.
Copyright © 2015 by James Graham
This page was archived at Way Back Machine on June 29, 2015.
- See more at: http://cancerselection.blogspot.com/2015/06/updated-visitors-to-this-site-and-their.html#sthash.OU3IBbTU.dpuf
Comments and questions are welcomed here.
At this site you will find links to additional material including my original Letters to the Journal of Theoretical Biology and the 1992 Nature review of my book.
Copyright © 2015 by James Graham
This page was archived at Way Back Machine on June 29, 2015.
- See more at: http://cancerselection.blogspot.com/2015/06/updated-visitors-to-this-site-and-their.html#sthash.OU3IBbTU.dpuf
At this site you will find links to additional material including my original Letters to the Journal of Theoretical Biology and the 1992 Nature review of my book.
Copyright © 2015 by James Graham
This page was archived at Way Back Machine on June 29, 2015.
- See more at: http://cancerselection.blogspot.com/2015/06/updated-visitors-to-this-site-and-their.html#sthash.OU3IBbTU.dpuf
Comments and questions are welcomed here.
At this site you will find links to additional material including my original Letters to the Journal of Theoretical Biology and the 1992 Nature review of my book.
Copyright © 2015 by James Graham
This page was archived at Way Back Machine on June 29, 2015.
- See more at: http://cancerselection.blogspot.com/2015/06/updated-visitors-to-this-site-and-their.html#sthash.OU3IBbTU.dpuf
At this site you will find links to additional material including my original Letters to the Journal of Theoretical Biology and the 1992 Nature review of my book.
Copyright © 2015 by James Graham
This page was archived at Way Back Machine on June 29, 2015.
- See more at: http://cancerselection.blogspot.com/2015/06/updated-visitors-to-this-site-and-their.html#sthash.OU3IBbTU.dpuf